Thursday, 15 November 2012

The Status of Non-Muslims Under Muslim Rule A good look inside islam and it's tyrannical nature

 Some folks wonder why I am so absolutely opposed and despising of islam. And for those of you about to call me 'Racist' you'd best think twice and consider that muslims are in no way a genetically-distinct sub-race from the Parent species of Homo Sapiens.
In short, muslims are in no way, shape, or form a 'Race'.

islam is the ideology of the Bully, the Tyrant, the Fascist. It is discriminatory, persecutionary, anti-Semitic, universally intolerant of anyone or anything outside itself and engages/encourages behaviour that can only be labelled as unspeakable, inhumane, ridiculous, and criminal in the extreme.

As you'll see below, the Pact of Umar is meant to do one thing and one thing only--make life as a non-muslim intolerable and slowly starve out into death any cultural aspects that are un-islamic. There are few things that demonstrate how truly abhorrent and despicable islam is other than this.

Those who claim that this doesn't apply or get applied in the modern world had best take a very good open-eyed look around the world first, and start noting the creeping aspects of this pact slowly being introduced over time by various means.
The current favourite is to engage in rioting for any and all reasons no matter how slight.
Look how well it's worked...the media and authorities are quick to quiet anyone or agency that dares say anything that might offend the muslims. Instead of growing spines and bringing the rioters to proper reckoning for their behaviour--instead the rioters are placated like spoiled children and those speaking of the islamic threat are the ones punished.
How very....Dhimmi.
islam and muslims keep pushing and pushing until they completely islamify an area.
If you don't believe me, thet's your call and choise to make. But do yourself a favor and look into what's happening in Belgium right now.

Here. where we live, it works like this;
muslims want to riot, it's a Terrorist Action.
If it's more than 30 muslims, it's called a Hostile Military Action as they're at Platoon strength and the Militia is sent to deal with them as well as the Police.
No, so called 'crowd-control' weapons are not employed. Throw a Molotov cocktail here, and you'll be shot in the same way and for the same reason as if you fired on the Cops with a gun.
A lethal weapon is a lethal weapon, and Molotov's as well as other Flame-Weapons are seriously frowned upon by the Geneva Convention.
Thus, a muslim rioter throwing one is opening himself up to persecution for war crimes.

I have no time for 'Moderates' and I rarely bother speaking to or with muslims--after 20+ years of listening to them, dealing with them, and fighting them I've heard it all before and there's nothing a muslim can say to me that will change my views on the incidents I was forced to witness and what is happening in the world today.
The facts are the facts and prettily-worded Taqqiya doesn't change them one bit.

I consider islam to be a genuine Threat to my family, my friends, my city, my nation, my culture and my way of life. I will not tolerate it, I will not accept it, and I will not listen to apologist or Denier rhetoric. This is a true Culture-war, and that is that. People can fool themselves into believing that's not the case, and listen to the comforting PolCorr Leftist drivel and fabrications about how islam is being 'misunderstood' and such rot.
That is the kind of thinking that allowed  the Nazis in WW2 to round up millions of Jews who thought the same way essentially--and only realised too late how stupid and wilfully-blind they'd been when they started breathing chlorine gas in the showers.

I came home to Canada to get away from islam and its inanities, silliness and live a quiet life in relative peace. Build a family, and enjoy my having survived the past couple of decades.
I will not tolerate it's antics here in my home nation, and especially not in my home city.

The Status of Non-Muslims Under Muslim Rule

Better to be wrongly called an islamophobe today, than a dhimmi tomorrow.
Pact of Umar
After the rapid expansion of the Muslim dominion in the 7th century, Muslims leaders were required to work out a way of dealing with Non-Muslims, who remained in the majority in many areas for centuries. The solution was to develop the notion of the “dhimma”, or “protected person”. The Dhimmi were required to pay an extra tax, but usually they were unmolested. This compares well with the treatment meted out to non-Christians in Christian Europe. The Pact of Umar is supposed to have been the peace accord offered by the Caliph Umar to the Christians of Syria, a “pact” which formed the patter of later interaction.
We heard from ‘Abd al-Rahman ibn Ghanam [died 78/697] as follows: When Umar ibn al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, accorded a peace to the Christians of Syria, we wrote to him as follows:
In the name of God, the Merciful and Compassionate. This is a letter to the servant of God Umar [ibn al-Khattab], Commander of the Faithful, from the Christians of such-and-such a city. When you came against us, we asked you for safe-conduct (aman) for ourselves, our descendants, our property, and the people of our community, and we undertook the following obligations toward you:
We shall not build, in our cities or in their neighborhood, new monasteries, Churches, convents, or monks’ cells, nor shall we repair, by day or by night, such of them as fall in ruins or are situated in the quarters of the Muslims.
We shall keep our gates wide open for passersby and travelers. We shall give board and lodging to all Muslims who pass our way for three days.
We shall not give shelter in our churches or in our dwellings to any spy, nor bide him from the Muslims.
We shall not teach the Qur’an to our children.
We shall not manifest our religion publicly nor convert anyone to it. We shall not prevent any of our kin from entering Islam if they wish it.
We shall show respect toward the Muslims, and we shall rise from our seats when they wish to sit.
We shall not seek to resemble the Muslims by imitating any of their garments, the qalansuwa, the turban, footwear, or the parting of the hair. We shall not speak as they do, nor shall we adopt their kunyas.
We shall not mount on saddles, nor shall we gird swords nor bear any kind of arms nor carry them on our- persons.
We shall not engrave Arabic inscriptions on our seals.
We shall not sell fermented drinks.
We shall clip the fronts of our heads.
We shall always dress in the same way wherever we may be, and we shall bind the zunar round our waists
We shall not display our crosses or our books in the roads or markets of the Muslims. We shall use only clappers in our churches very softly. We shall not raise our voices when following our dead. We shall not show lights on any of the roads of the Muslims or in their markets. We shall not bury our dead near the Muslims.
We shall not take slaves who have beenallotted to Muslims.
We shall not build houses overtopping the houses of the Muslims.
(When I brought the letter to Umar, may God be pleased with him, he added, “We shall not strike a Muslim.”)
We accept these conditions for ourselves and for the people of our community, and in return we receive safe-conduct.
If we in any way violate these undertakings for which we ourselves stand surety, we forfeit our covenant [dhimma], and we become liable to the penalties for contumacy and sedition.
Umar ibn al-Khittab replied: Sign what they ask, but add two clauses and impose them in addition to those which they have undertaken. They are: “They shall not buy anyone made prisoner by the Muslims,” and “Whoever strikes a Muslim with deliberate intent shall forfeit the protection of this pact.”
from Al-Turtushi, Siraj al-Muluk, pp. 229-230.
[This was a from hand out at an Islamic History Class at the University of Edinburgh in 1979. Source of translation not given.]
via Medieval Sourcebook: Pact of Umar, 7th Century.
  1. Exactly – and that is why we cannot accept subjugation – we condemn our kids to islam if we revert or just accept dhimmitude. Accepting dhimmitude makes their lives hard, and in jeopardy. There is no retaliation for what a moslem does to a non-moslem.
    here is the sharia law for what I just wrote, but take note of the other things that are ok in islam under this law:
    o1.2 The following are not subject to retaliation for killing:
    (1) a child or insane person….
    (2) a moslem for killing a non-moslem
    (3) … for killing an apostate…
    (4) a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.

The Status of Non-Muslims Under Muslim Rule « Creeping Sharia

No comments:

Post a Comment